Nope b4 is definitely faster. And the ant based b5 stuff was faster still.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers


David Dixon-Peugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/13/2002 12:31:23 PM:

> 
> I'm sure you've noticed this already, but building
> with Maven (b5) is taking quite a long time.
> 
> Looks to me as if there are no threads being used
> in the build tool.  (Maven stays on only one 
> processor. . .)
> 
> It seems to me, that Maven has some embarassingly
> parallel aspects to it, and perhaps we should look
> into exploiting them.
> 
> Additionally, for the Blue Sky request, I think it
> would be great if Maven could work in a distributed
> environment.  Definitely very apropriate for a 
> massive build solution.
> 
> Sorry for the rant, I've just been looking at the
> Maven logo for quite some time.  (Maybe it only
> looked faster before b5 because of all the output. .
> .)
> 
> DDP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

Reply via email to