From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I read it, I just don't think it's intuitive. > > > > "If a "+" is found then the artifact name is a concatenation of the lhs > > and rhs of the "+" where the "+" is replaced with a "-". If there are" > > > > ant+optional version 1.4.1 becomes ant-optional-1.4.1.jar, whereas ant > > version 1.4.1 becomes ant-1.4.1.jar... > > > > I understand it and why..........but intuitive it aint. To me it looks > > like the <id> is playing double duty as a tag. It'd more intuitive to give > > it another name rather than cramming it into the same tag, IMHO. > > I tend to agree. How about we have > > <id>ant</id> > <part>optional</id> > <version>1.4.1</version>
I meant... <id>ant</id> <part>optional</part> <version>1.4.1</version> > Which if no part is specified its ignored (ant-1.4.1.jar), otherwise its > used to make ant-optional-1.4.1.jar James __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.comm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
