On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 08:58, Stephen Haberman wrote: > > I might explore moving this from the configuration file to the OM > objects. E.g. instead of calling Torque.getManager() the base > object/peer has a default manager which can be over-ridden in the > extension class. Does this sound like a good idea?
It sounds like a good addition, but I don't think it can replace the Torque.getManager(). I see a chicken/egg problem. john mcnally -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
