I understood this. The problem I see is, that I have to reimplement also the Interfaces used by the Security Service. This means basically creating a totally new Service. This would not be an issue, if Turbine is not using this anywhere. But I think this is not the OO way on how to do this. At least from what I think. Maybe I am wrong here.
At 11:15 25.09.2002 -0700, you wrote: >on 2002/9/25 10:37 AM, "Markus M. May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > today I looked a little into the FULCRUM Security Service. I believe that > > like it is right now, there is nearly no possibility to use OJB together > > with Turbine. Fulcrum as well as Turbine is still coupled with Torque via > > for example the Criteria Object. Because this is very different from the > > OJB Criteria Object, there is IMHO no way to do a mapping. > >#1. You don't need to use Fulcrum's security service in order to use >Turbine. Turbine is a lot more than just Fulcrum's security service. > >#2. You can re-implement the DBSecurityService.java to use OBJ instead of >Torque and that should be all you really need to do. There may be a few left >over imports that you need to fix, but other than that, it should be pretty >easy. > >-jon > >-- >StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment >314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco > http://studioz.tv/ > > >-- >To unsubscribe, >e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---+++--------------------+++---------------------+++--- Markus M. May [EMAIL PROTECTED] Provide you with free J2EE projects Please use my public key at: http://www.javafreedom.org/mmay_javafreedom_org.key ---+++--------------------+++---------------------+++--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
