on 2002/9/25 11:36 AM, "Markus M. May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understood this. The problem I see is, that I have to reimplement also
> the Interfaces used by the Security Service. This means basically creating
> a totally new Service.
Yup. The service creation shouldn't be that hard though. It is just a
wrapper around the rest of the service (users/roles/permissions) which do
not seem to be encumbered by Torque dependencies. Fulcrum is beautiful
because it makes it easy to create new services.
Let me also point out that OJB is very very very new. Turbine has been
around in one form or another since at least 1998...
> This would not be an issue, if Turbine is not using this anywhere. But I
> think this is not the OO way on how to do this. At least from what I think.
> Maybe I am wrong here.
Turbine *optionally* uses Fulcrum's services. You can easily configure
turbine to not use any services at all and still benefit from the MVC model
that Turbine encourages. Like I said, there is a lot more to Turbine than
Fulcrum's use.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
