Hi, > I am willing to implement some sort of workaround if there a plans for a fix > in the very near future, but if not I will be forced to use something else, > which of course is something I would really like to avoid. Considering that > a fix would be very straight-forward to implement, I don't think it's > unreasonable to expect it before the next beta.
I agree with Martin. Torque will not be of much use for my purpose if it does not support iteration over large number records. Are there any plans to fix this problem? Regards, Anmol -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
