> I agree with Martin. Torque will not be of much use for my purpose if it > does not support iteration over large number records. > Are there any plans to fix this problem?
It's in the works. As Scott mentioned before, he's got a working version of LargeSelect in the repository. As soon as we can start testing it and verifying it works, I could for see adding it to the Peer classes, so that instead of doing: List l = XxxPeer.doSelect(c); You could do: List l = XxxPeer.doLargeSelect(c); And it would return a List implementation based on Scott's LargeSelect work. As far as when this gets into Torque, as Scott said, his LargeSelect will be in the next beta, but it might be another beta before the peers have a doLargeSelect function. Unless things really come together quickly, but I'm off on vacation here pretty soon, so another committer would have to pick up on Scott's contributions and go from there. - Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
