John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I am dropping my original proposal and if Eric does not come up with a
> preferred solution soon, we will probably accept yours.  I have some
> question on the toString() method.  Can the code be structured to append
> to a common StringBuffer?  As few conversion between String and
> StringBuffer as possible is a desired goal.

+1, this is an important design goal to keep the code as efficient as
possible.

Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to