Thanks Dienstag.
If I use Struts as the JSP layer, would it be ok to use some of the API of
turbine, like Connection Pooling, Scheduling, etc. I will not develop the
application using turbine framework, but just use some of the API provided
by turbine.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Wagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Structs or Turbine.
Hi!
Am Dienstag, 21. August 2001 16:32 schrieben Sie:
> I have seen another project called structs. It also provides most of the
> services provided by Turbine as far as web layer is considered, like
> session management, actions, templates. But Turbine is good for the
> backend, like connection pooling, etc.
I think you mean Struts. Well it's the framework which is strongly connected
to the J2EE. So if you want that, especially if you want to use JSP, have a
look at Struts again.
Turbine uses a different way to do things. But I like it and think it's
easier than J2EE, because it has so many utilities.
So make your choice.
> In my project, I am not sure if it is good to use structs in the web layer
> and use turbine as the business logic layer. Would this create a problem
of
> using two types of projects in the same project.
>From my point of view: Don't do it.
Maybe it's possible but you'll have more problems than advantages.
> Also if I decide to use Turbine, why would I have to use Structs.
JSP isn't supported as good as in Struts.
> Gururaj.
And read the archive for other opinions!
Ciao,
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
