On 10/3/01 10:51 AM, "Dan Bachelder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> following the examples in "torque outside turbine - detailed example (long)" > from last month on this list. > > I had generated my OM from the torque that is available for DL from the > turbine site.. the jar says 1.0... when I got around to initing Torque i > realized there was no .init(String) method... so I got torque from CVS and > build that... now, it does have .init(String)... woo.. anyway, my question, am > I okay using the OM that I generated with the other version or should i go > back and recreate it? I noticed the jar is almost double the size... not sure > why 2 jars labeled 1.0 are so different... can anyone tell me what is going > on? I probably shouldn't have called it 1.0. The decoupled Torque has not been released and it is still use at your own risk. The size difference is due to the packaging of the templates in the JAR. The torque templates can be accessed from within JAR with some recent changes to Texen. > </dan> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
