On 10/3/01 1:31 PM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:55 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: torque outside turbine >> >> >> Fedor Karpelevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> What about numbering upcoming torque 3.0 to make it clear >> that it _follows_ >>> torque from turbine 2.x even though it was not standalone there. >> >> I like this, nice suggestion Fedor. >> >>> Having 2.1 followed by 1.0 is somewhat confusing. It will also make >>> it look more mature which is pure marketing, but does reflect >>> reality... >> >> Yup, versions numbers mean a lot to marketing and management. >> >> Also, I would like to attach -dev to whatever version is chosen for >> Torque and Fulcrum, as a reminder that they have not been released. > > what about also appending build date or number to be able to tell what > particular dev build we are talking about... > so that would be torque-3.0-dev-20011003.jar or similar Nightly builds can be made that will produce bundles that are tagged by date. I'm not sure adding the date to the jar does much good. Where does the number come from? Someone may not update their repository and than build so the number doesn't mean much. Gump can produce nightly builds if we want and people can refer to the date of a jar produced. > fedor. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
