i think, everybody is keen on having a
stable production framework.
many companies i've been at tried hard
on building their own and most of them
either failed or are still working on it,
after years.
it's all explained here:
-> "the cathedral and the bazaar"
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
the above reading is the beginning for your argumentation,
turbine is the proof of concept.
;)
--
heiko braun, fork unstable media
http://www.unstablemedia.com
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Lothar Krause wrote:
> >
> >
> >Turbine Rulez. Why IMHO ?
> >
> >1. The Pull Service provides the most flexible yet simplistic approach to
> >web development using the MVC model I have ever used/seen/evaluated.
> >2. Velocity. Nothing else needs to be said here :-)
> >3. The great support of the Turbine/Velocity community !! (I'm not being
> >sarcastic, I learn't Turbine just by being on this mailing list).
> >4. YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE SOURCE CODE !!! (This should win it)
> >5. The array of tools is very complete, OR Tools (Torque), Caching, Pooling,
> >Security (Flux), Forms Validation (Intake), Logging ... and the list goes
> >on.
> >6. It's a pleasure using it.
> >7. It's Free
> >
> >
> >p.s Thanks to all the ppl involved with Turbine. I love this product. :-)
> >
> I got defeated by the argument that according to the TODO list on the
> website Turbine is in a development stage that is unuseable for
> production :-(
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
