On 12/7/01 9:55 PM, "Kelvin Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the repost, but no response to this, so I thought I'd try again. > Maybe this belongs to Turbine-Dev though... > When the services were decoupled from fulcrum I started cleaning up the service code but it still needs work. It is somewhat confusing, we know. Bottom line is that you get hold of the service by its name and not the classname. Those methods that refer to getting a service by classname should be made protected because they aren't used outside the service broker. >> In BaseServiceBroker, how are the services supposed to be stored in the >> Services hashtable? >> >> services.put(name, service) or services.put(className, service) ? >> >> Within getServiceInstance(String name), >> >> service.setServiceBroker(this); >> service.setName(name); >> services.put(name, service); >> >> But there's code elsewhere which attempts to retrieve the service by >> classname... >> >> Kelvin >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
