Their JDO implementation does bytecode manipulation to mark classes as persistence, whereas, torque/peers is a code generator.
I have worked with JDO, castor and torque and at this point I would recommend torque. At 02:01 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Hi, > >Does anyone have any experiences with JDO versus Torque? > >I was playing with Forte as my IDE for my Turbine projects, and ran across >their information on Transaparent Persitence.. Is JDO doing under the >covers the same things that Torque does? > >Eric > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
