Hi Not to be too restrictive. You can consider a strategy 1. Torque 2. Castor (if some of the restrictions is not a concern to you)
Before diving in to more primitive APIs... Regards ========== Ian Lim email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 07:21 AM Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque > Their JDO implementation does bytecode manipulation to mark classes as > persistence, whereas, torque/peers is a code generator. > > I have worked with JDO, castor and torque and at this point I would > recommend torque. > > At 02:01 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Does anyone have any experiences with JDO versus Torque? > > > >I was playing with Forte as my IDE for my Turbine projects, and ran across > >their information on Transaparent Persitence.. Is JDO doing under the > >covers the same things that Torque does? > > > >Eric > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
