> From: Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While I'm waiting for 2.2 final to describe the 2.1/2.2 differences, I can > help out as a proof reader/additional copywriter for stuff. Great. But why wait for 2.2 final? > > I'm catching up on reading all the threads from yesterday, so I've skimmed a > fair bit, but I think an _*easily accessbile*_ FAQ would be a bonus for > people, there's at least a Top 10 we should compile for 2.1 as a helping > hand to anyone who has to stay in 2.1 land for a while. (Chris/Quiton, > perhaps this should be added to the Top level @ > http://www.fenetics.com/turbine/index.html ?) > > If this would be useful, perhaps we should gather the list of items (as in > single sentence description) we'd like to include in the FAQ, and then I > could canvas appropriate detailed response content from the experts, and/or > build some links to the appropriate place in the rest of the docs. > > Some examples I am thinking of here are: > > * java.lang.VerifyError using TDK (this seems to crop up once every days or > so) > * Extending TurbineUser (this would just link directly to appropriate docs > area) > * Upload issues (i.e. a couple of specific bugs/issues that people often > request, particularly in 2.1) By all means, compile whatever you can wherever you can. In all seriousness, the answers to all FAQ questions can most likely be links to messages in the mail archives (if they have been asked frequently the will most likely have been answered frequently).
I'll try and organise a twiki so that we can bring all this stuff back to a central location. Cheers, Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
