Oops.. as the text states i meant Torque vs Hibernate, was a little late when i wrote that message :)
However, how is the integration with the new security system and hibernate then? Is it hard to setup with Hibernate? /Martin -----Original Message----- From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. juni 2004 09:02 To: Turbine Users List Subject: RE: Torque vs Turbine? It's not a Torque vs Turbine, as Turbine has moved (except for some old API stuff) to a persistence layer agnostic view. I would recommend Hibernate, it's fantastic, and much simpler/powerful to use then Torque. Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: ANSI Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 11:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Torque vs Turbine? > > > I've been trying to read up about torque vs hibernate, but not much have > come up so far... > > What i'm trying to figure out, is if i should use one or the > other db layer > for an online community that im creating. > > The framework will be Turbine, built with Velocity. > > The scale of the things will be from around 1000-5000 online users, and > 500.000+ registrered members. > > I've heard some good things about both of them, but i'd like a little more > information before i set it in stone and it is too late. > > > Regards > /Martin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
