Although Scott A.'s design is very robust it omits a class to hold a collection of PersistentObject(s) similar to the JDBC's ResultSet. To account for this i was looking at two solutions to fix this. 1: create a new object "ObjectSet" that implements the java.sql.ResultSet interface or 2: create a new object that implements a sub-set of the java.sql.ResultSet interface. Ideally choosing the first option would allow java developers all over the world to treat a collection of Persistent objects exactly the same as a JDBC ResultSet. The downfall to this is that there are ~125 methods that need to be present to implement the java.sql.ResultSet interface which is a hole hell of allot of work. ....opinions anyone??? -scott- ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
