--- jon * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 12/27/99 12:00 PM, Scott Tavares
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have proposed this before but didn't get any
> feedback on it. One thing
> > that i see missing in SA's design is a collection
> class that holds a set of
> > POs. I was thinking of creating an "ObjectSet"
> class that extends Village's
> > DataSet. what do you all think?
> >
> > can i get a vote on this please...
>
IMHO, it's implementation will rely on the
implementation for associations.
The implementation will probably be recursive, because
related classes may have their own related classes.
>
> > also i would like to bring up the topic of OIDs
> again. what i'd like to here
> > is implement the OID as defined in SA's Mapping
> Objects To Relational
> > Databases white paper but make it a "service' in
> the Turbine style so that
> > if this implementation does not fit into someone's
> legacy data schema they
> > can more easily replace it with their own
> creation. comments please.....
>
Cool.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
