At 03:00 PM 12/27/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I have proposed this before but didn't get any feedback on it. One thing
>that i see missing in SA's design is a collection class that holds a set of
>POs. I was thinking of creating an "ObjectSet" class that extends Village's
>DataSet. what do you all think?
>
>can i get a vote on this please...
>
>+1
+1 on the object set
>
>also i would like to bring up the topic of OIDs again. what i'd like to here
>is implement the OID as defined in SA's Mapping Objects To Relational
>Databases white paper but make it a "service' in the Turbine style so that
>if this implementation does not fit into someone's legacy data schema they
>can more easily replace it with their own creation. comments please.....
>
>-scott-
>
Sounds interesting. This sounds like a definite feature we need. Maybe we
could make an OIDMap.java class because unfortunately a lot of legacy data
have keys with "business" meaning. The primary feature of a key is
uniqueness. We could use the isKeyColumn() method of the ColumnMap to build
the map. The map would in turn be able to print out the where clause which
could uniquely identify the object. I dont know much about how we would
encapsulate this as a service though. I guess I would have to check out the
rest of Turbine a little bit more.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Jeff Prickett
Whoever loves money never has money enough;| Jeff Prickett
whoever loves wealth is never | J2 Solutions
satsified with his income. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This too is meaningless. | PH: 302-945-5520
Ecclesiastes 5:10 | Fax: 302-945-5216
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
