Is there any reason that the peer class used by TurbineUser is not
pluggable? I'm looking at using an LDAP directory instead of a database
to store user information and it seems to make more sense to replace the
TurbineUserPeer class then it does to replace the TurbineUser class. Any
suggestions on the best way to implement this?
--
Kimbro Staken
Chief Technology Officer
Infostreet Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
