you need to replace (extend) the TurbineUser class and override methods
which use TurbineUserPeer.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kimbro Staken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 10:30 AM
Subject: TurbineUser and peers
> Is there any reason that the peer class used by TurbineUser is not
> pluggable? I'm looking at using an LDAP directory instead of a database
> to store user information and it seems to make more sense to replace the
> TurbineUserPeer class then it does to replace the TurbineUser class. Any
> suggestions on the best way to implement this?
>
> --
> Kimbro Staken
> Chief Technology Officer
> Infostreet Inc.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
