----- Original Message -----
From: george stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: OPaL init in Turbine.doGet() and more
<snip>
> Move the db stuff from persistence broker to
> dbconnection, and let it percolate up. Then, you
> don't need the catch/finally junk.
>
could you explain this a bit more so that i can get a better understanding
of what you mean? TIA.
> It's actually bad marketing to keep it in turbine.
> Who can see it there? After all the work I did, I've
> gotten close to zero feedback. Probably, it would
> help tremendously to have a working sample.
i agree that a working sample is needed but i feel that a major component
OPaL is the ClassMap loading. Without it any "working sample" really would
not be working ;-). I am working on this functionally but i've had a bit of
a detour from the XML Schema stuff. if you would like to know where i am
just let me know.
>
> In an earlier mail, I gave Scott a db class and a
> hand-coded class map. Only thing missing is the
> pooling code. Marc Minch would let apache use his.
>
>
well i remember talking to you about the hand-coded class map but i do not
believe you ever sent it to me. could you give me the link to Marc's page?
i'd like to at leased take a look at it and if i see that it has significant
advantages over Turbine's db pooling (which will be very difficult to do) i
will help you lobby to get in, that is if Marc agrees to put under the
Apache license.
-scott-
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
