Ok I tried "JDK 1.1.8 IBM build l118-19991221 (JIT enabled: jitc)" with the
same problem. The built in dependency checking in javac has caused more
stress than it was worth. That is the one feature I wish had been done
right or left out. It seems hardly any javac's do it right. I am correct
to say that Ant uses one call to javac and only uses the compilers built in
dependency checking? Might I ask what you are using for a compiler? Is 1.2
on NT considered the reference? Is anyone else building on Linux and could
point me to a JDK that is known to work with the current build?
~christopher
----- Original Message -----
From: jon * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Status of current snapshot
> on 2/15/00 6:12 PM, christopher baus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Excuse my ignorance, but what is jikes?
>
> by far the fastest Javac.
>
>
<http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jikes/project/index.h
> tml>
>
> > I am using blackdown's JDK 1.1.8 on
> > Linux and have modified the build-turbine.sh script to reflect my
classpath.
> > This seemed to work last week. And being new to Ant, I'm having a
difficult
> > time determining if the problem is in the Ant configuration.
>
> Nope, it isn't Ant. It is a failure in your javac to resolve dependencies
> correctly (BasePeer and BaseObject depend on each other). You might want
to
> try another javac. Maybe try IBM's JDK for linux or sun's jdk for linux or
> try a newer version of Blackdown.
>
> I did successfully compile this with FreeBSD's 1.1.8 JDK as well as my JDK
> 1.2 on NT on saturday and sunday and I don't think that there have been
any
> major code changes since then that would break this.
>
> I see this as a compiler bug and not a coding bug.
>
> I won't compile with jikes for the same reason that it is failing with
BJDK
> 1.1.8.
>
> > BTW, I really like this project. I started down a similar path, but
turbine
> > was so much further along than I, that I decided to support this project
> > instead.
>
> thanks! Great idea. ;-)
>
> -jon
>
> --
> Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
> Conference! <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
