Dave Bryson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Why do you think I asked the group instead of just committing it to the
> tree?
>
> I realize there's issues involved.
>
> Christopher Elkins wrote:
>
> > Here's a fly in the ointment: how do you plan to deal with WebMacro's
> > JDK 1.1/1.2 issues?
>
> Instead of how do *I* plan, how about how do *we* plan? How about
> providing
> a suggested solution instead of belting out obvious reasons why it won't
> work.
>
Considering that your post only mentioned that there _exists_ potential
build-breaking problems and no explanation of what those problems _are_,
how was I to presume that this was the issue you were asking about?
Here's my suggestion: include two WebMacro jars with Turbine, one compiled
using JDK1.1 and one compiled using JDK1.2. Jon already said there are
no licensing problems. In the build-turbine scripts, default to the JDK 1.1.
> >
> > Also, WebMacro is GPL. If we distribute jars, won't we have to include
> > the full source as well?
>
> I think we need to look how we can address this problem. This is why I
> suggested earlier that maybe we need a separate spot where people can
> contribute Turbine applications or solutions that involve other
> open-source software. For example, this WebMacro service would be a
> good example. If someone wanted to use it they could grab it from the
> application area and add it to there local copy.
>
> Otherwise, we're right back to where we're trying to get away from -
> everybody solving the same
> problems over and over in isolation.
>
> dave
>
--
Christopher Elkins
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
