Re: What persistence framework recommended for Turbine apps?

[Alejandro P. Revilla]

> 
> There seem to be three options suggested by existing Turbine code.
> 
>    1. Use the Peer approach used within org.apache.turbine.om.*
>       This uses village.
>    2. Use the OPaL, which seems to be much more sophisticated
>       but which I understand is incomplete.  OPaL does not use
>       village.
>    3. Use village and JDBC without having a Peer for each
>       major object.  This seems to be the approach taken by Jyve.
> 
I would add yet another option:

     4. Use Castor (http://castor.exolab.org)

--Alejandro



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]