On Sat, 06 May 2000, you wrote:
>I had started to do all this, but am now fully side tracked by
>Scarab...I have to get that working first, so it is great that you are
>doing this. I'm essentially doing a lot of this same work, but it needs
>to be Scarab specific...:-(
I'm also over-whelmed with work related applications right now. So
i'll be doing this slowly. I want to also jump in on Scarab once I
get a little ahead.
> I agree. I would actually like to see us use the WebMacroSiteLayout instead
> though. It is a better methodology and I actually would like to deprecate
> the BaseWebMacro stuff...what do you think of that?
I brought up using the WMSiteLayout before, but got no response. I
agree about deprecating it. I'm currently using the BaseWebMacro stuff
in an application but would like to migrate to the Layout style once
it's completely dependable. I think by focusing on one way of dealing
with WM in Turbine we can improve it faster.
> I don't mind making people edit properties files as long as we do a really
> good job of making it clear what needs to change and why.
I still believe we can consolidate all the template stuff into one
default page. This way there's little configuration - it's just there
if you need it.
--
dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------
< your inspirational quote here >
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
