----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Persistent Layer : who already used it ?
> on 5/31/2000 7:41 AM, Sean Legassick at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sounds like interesting stuff ... maybe we can extract some of the cool
> > stuff into the Peer model if appropriate/you are willing?
>
> Ok, here is my vote:
>
> Lets dump what we have of OPaL from CVS. It causes new users to much
> trouble. It isn't documented and isn't finished and doesn't look like it
> will be any time soon.
>
> Lets improve BasePeer to support whatever features that people need. It is
> already pretty complete and is only missing some minor features like
> transactions. I say minor because they can probably be added fairly easily
> with wrapper objects. I'm using it quite heavily on Scarab and it has been
> used on two other projects for Clear Ink. In other words, it is pretty
well
> tested, works very nicely, has the auto-generation stuff nearly complete,
> has the IDBroker working, etc.
>
> -jon
+1
although OPaL has a very slick design, it is a day too late. There are too
many other options to warrant the effort to complete it. I like the BasePeer
stuff but am using EJBs with EJBOSS which has both container and bean
managed persistence.
-Scott-
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
