> > It doesn't need to be marked Serializable because BaseObject (which it > extends) is. > You are right. I thought I remembered reading that the Serializable interface was not automatically inherited in subclasses , though a reread shows completely the opposite. I still think it is good to have it in the User interface as a class which implements User does not have to extend from BaseObject. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Jon Stevens
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Sean Legassick
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Jon Stevens
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Sean Legassick
- session serialization (was: Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK ... Jon Stevens
- Re: session serialization Jon Stevens
- Re: session serialization Sean Legassick
- Re: session serialization Jon Stevens
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? John McNally
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Jon Stevens
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? John McNally
- Re: Pros and Cons of JSDK 2.0 vs 2.2? Jon Stevens
