> 4546 TWMS handleRequest done (screens/SiteInfo)
> 4546 TWMS handleRequest start (layouts/default.wm)
> 4546 TWMS handleRequest got template (layouts/default.wm)
> 5359 TWMS handleRequest start (navigations//LeftNav)
> 5375 TWMS handleRequest got template (navigations//LeftNav)
> 5546 TWMS handleRequest wrote template (navigations//LeftNav)
> 5546 TWMS handleRequest result to string (navigations//LeftNav)
> 5546 TWMS handleRequest done (navigations//LeftNav)
> 6578 TWMS handleRequest start (navigations//TopNav)
It appears there is a penalty incurred by parsing a template within a
template. I was thinking that the way we were calling the navigation
templates was actually faster since they could be cached by WM, unlike when
using the #parse directive. But are they? There is a .8 s when starting
the LeftNav and 1.3 s lapse when starting the TopNav.
This is certainly worth extra effort to figure out exactly what is causing
this delay.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
