on 7/27/2000 6:00 AM, "Christoph Reck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I making sense here?
>
> I've done a similar thing with a very generic and powerfull XML
> configuration language (existing before, but similar to JDK 1.3 XML
> serialization and SOAP XML encoding rules). This should be mapped into
> a turbine-site specific syntax (as above). I have used this in a
> standalone java application with swing and corba and it works beautifully!
> It controls/monitors/operates a big distributed archive and production
> system with about 10 targets. More being plugged in every month.
> In this new project I'm required to produce a pure browser based
> solution interfacing with files/scripts :.( what a step back!
> I have up to the end of the year.
>
> Christoph Reck
You are making sense. This is something the Lucasarts guys want. Go for it.
Try to not have to change the core of Turbine. :-)
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
