Thanks to everyone who took the time to check out my project
(http://www.nanoworks.com/XForm/). I'm blown away by the feedback and
suggestions I've gotten in only the first couple of hours. I guess
it's true what they say about the open source community...
It seems that licensing XForm under GPL is not making too many people
happy, and though I'm a supporter of the strong copyleft concept, I'm
more concerned with helping to build awesome software that people are
comfortable (in the legal sense) using and sharing. Therefore I'll
gladly change the license to one more appropriate for this purpose, as
I have it on good authority that it is my right to do so.
I'd like to ask for more feedback on which license to choose. I'm sure
much of this has been debated in these lists before, so I appreciate
your patience on this issue.
I've heard from Turbine folks, as well as from someone working on
Enhydra that MPL is acceptable. As I'd like XForm to be usable within
as many open frameworks as possible, this would seem like a good
choice.
Does anybody differ or agree strongly with this choice ???
Thanks,
Douglas Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nanoworks.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
--
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
