--- Etienne-Hugues Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lately, I read a lot about different framework and
> applications servers. One interesting thing, is
> that about each of them claim to give access to db
> connection pool easily. When you look further, some
> force you to use *their* database or other major
> (usually it means Oracle only) and others have
> absolutely no restrictions at all. Now, as I'm
> trying to start a new project and I'm getting stuck
> by the choice of the database. I need a database
> that can be used on the internet and where licensing
> is based on simultaneous connection instead of per
> user (which usually mean that we can't use it on the
> web). Price is also a factor because I don't want
> my customers to pay 90% for Oracle or IBM product
> and only 10% for my development.
>
> Our new product will be used by lof of different
> company so I can't just pick what a specific
> customer have in-house and use it. So, what people
> who do web development with Turbine use as their
> database backend? I guess it will be Oracle and
> Sybase based on what I read on the "HowTo: Database
> Adapters" but just in case...
>
> What would be the different DB that can be easily
> include with our development without too much
> concern about license (or with license program that
> are easy to work with)?
>
I like PostgreSQL. It's open source and has made
great strides in recent years. It has some flaws. No
support in back end for pre-compiling queries, and, as
pointed out by Nissim, an unusal way of storing large
objects. Once, pre-compiling is added to the backend,
this product should have great performance.
Regards, george
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]