Jon Stevens wrote:
> [snip]
> Now, the question of whether or not to use Joist or Turbine has been up in
> the air since I started working at Collab.Net. I'm sure that my opinion is
> perfectly clear, but the issue is migrating all the code from Joist to
> Turbine will be a huge amount of work. So, the experiment with Turbine will
> be Scarab. If Scarab is successful, then that will be a strong case to
> switch things to Turbine. I'm very confident that Scarab will be successful.
Jon provided a very good history lesson here. I am familiar with both
Joist and Turbine, and while both code bases are good, Joist does not
quite provide the flexibility or as many features as Turbine (though the
code base is much smaller). Eventually, I'd like to use Turbine in
Joist wherever functionality overlaps. This is actually one of my
reasons for wanting the core Turbine package to be a separate download
from the TDK (Joist is currently only on friendly terms with JServ and
MySQL).
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
