Are you using a jdbc 1.0 driver? I would think if it is supported by the
driver it would mask it as a LongVarChar or something like that, so
Village/BasePeer would have no problem with it.
As far as updating Village to include jdbc 2.0 types, people might want to
comment on this. Jon has been reluctant in the past to extend Village to
jdbc2.0, he has always suggested switching to Town as an alternative. But
Town is GPL and uses jdk1.2 methods/objects. The jdk1.2 might cease to be
an issue after a release of Turbine and Jon was confident he could get the
author of Town to convert to a BSD style license, though there are
contributions from a few authors, so it might be a sticky situation.
Sorry I have no good answer.
John McNally
----- Original Message -----
From: Leon Messerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 1:07 PM
Subject: CLOB, Oracle and Peer
> Hi
>
> Has anyone ever used Oracle and CLOBs with Peer. I've searched the
archives and I
> did not find anything that was enlightening.
>
> I've tried to get Village and Peer to work with a CLOB but to no avail.
I'll
> appreciate any advice. BTW, I can't change the column type.
>
> ~ Leon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]