on 8/15/2000 2:27 PM, "John McNally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using a jdbc 1.0 driver? I would think if it is supported by the
> driver it would mask it as a LongVarChar or something like that, so
> Village/BasePeer would have no problem with it.
>
> As far as updating Village to include jdbc 2.0 types, people might want to
> comment on this. Jon has been reluctant in the past to extend Village to
> jdbc2.0, he has always suggested switching to Town as an alternative. But
> Town is GPL and uses jdk1.2 methods/objects. The jdk1.2 might cease to be
> an issue after a release of Turbine and Jon was confident he could get the
> author of Town to convert to a BSD style license, though there are
> contributions from a few authors, so it might be a sticky situation.
switching town to BSD has already been approved. that isn't an issue.
i don't want to switch turbine to town though. it uses jdk 1.2 stuff and
also has way to much overlap with the Peer model. it will confuse people.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
