At 07:09 25/8/00 +0200, you wrote:
>> - Incorporate IBM Log4J package as the default back-end for the log service
>
>+1, I was thinking about doing this myself, but I have lot of other things
to do,
>so go ahead.
There is another option. Recently there was a log package checked into the
Avalon project at java.apache.org. It is slightly faster than log4j and
IMHO more well designed. But I am the author so I may be biased.
The only negative when compared to log4j is that there are fewer output
targets. In my possession I have a lot more but they are unfortunately
owned by various buisnesses. As I get permission I will include it into
Avalon but until then it only logs to files/stdout.
Cheers,
Pete
*------------------------------------------------------*
| "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
| to test a man's character, give him power." |
| -Abraham Lincoln |
*------------------------------------------------------*
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
