Christopher Elkins wrote:
>
> > > -1, the TDK should be in it's own repository. +1 on moving it into the
> > > tdk repository.
> >
> > Yes. I agree with Daniel, but let me expand on that.
> >
> Thanks for the elaboration. I was just about to send an email saying you
> can't -1 a proposal without good reason (or good explanation). ;-)
If you look through the archives, you'll notice that it's already been
covered. :)
I felt like I was retreading ground that we'd already covered. You
might want to do a search for that thread, it has a few other ideas that
you might want to consider. Thanks for knocking the TDK into shape
Chris!
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
