> > > > -1, the TDK should be in it's own repository. +1 on moving it into the
> > > > tdk repository.
> > >
> > > Yes. I agree with Daniel, but let me expand on that.
> > >
> > Thanks for the elaboration. I was just about to send an email saying you
> > can't -1 a proposal without good reason (or good explanation). ;-)
>
> If you look through the archives, you'll notice that it's already been
> covered. :)
> I felt like I was retreading ground that we'd already covered. You
> might want to do a search for that thread, it has a few other ideas that
> you might want to consider. Thanks for knocking the TDK into shape
> Chris!
Actually, I've been re-reading those threads quite often over the last few days,
but I honestly don't recall seeing this exact issue discussed. If I missed it,
feel free to slap me. ;-)
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Christopher Elkins
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
