on 9/5/2000 1:19 AM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, but worry about people not knowing enough to differentiate
> between the two. Jon, if you think that implementing the shutdown would
> be straightforward, I would like to go ahead with that rather than see
> this come up repeatedly. ;)
>
> Dan
Sure, but you will need to do some work to implement this. I don't want to
see people willy nilly adding stuff to Turbine.destroy(). I think there
should be something in the Services architecture that allows people to
register a method that gets called by the services architecture. Then, in
Turbine.destroy() you should call the services.destroy() to shut all the
services down.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
