on 9/14/2000 4:31 PM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that the term 'Group' is more general. For Scarab 'Team' sounds great,
> but 'A group of users related to a document' sounds more natural than
> 'A team of users related to a document'.
>
> Rafal
So, what does the database schema look like? "group" is a reserved keyword.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
