Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> John McNally wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think that we could also rearange the DB schemas.
> > > Visitor -> User
> > > UserRole -> Role
> > > VisitorRole -> UserTeamRole
> > >
> >
> > User and Role are reserved names in some db's. That is why they have the
> > names they have.
>
> I have yet another idea for avoiding SQL reserved words, while keeping
> names consistent with the code. How about:
>
> TurbineUser
> TurbineGroup
> TurbineRole
> TurbinePermission
> TurbineUserGroupRole
> TurbineRolePermission
>
> What do you think about these?
I think that this is a good idea. Jon, isn't something similar being
done in Scarab?
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
