Shamil Yahin wrote:

> RK> Nice, but what about both applications sharing all the singletons
> RK> including services, and db conncection pool? It may be not desirable
> RK> in many situations.
> 
> This solution is exactly for cases where both application _want_ to share
> common services, session info, etc... :)
> 
> For example, in our project we have modular architecture around some
> core. The core provides some common things like singeltones, db
> connection pool, objects in session, etc.

OK, understood. This might be generaly useful. There are some things to 
consider before we start incorporating your donated code:

1. Single application setup should not suffer from additional complication
   in configuration/url format

2. there should be a possibility to specify template directories per 
   application (in TemplateService)

Rafal


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to