Leon Messerschmidt wrote:
>
> Speaking of jpython integration. I'm not sure if we want to distribute the
> jpython.jar with Turbine - most people will probably not want to.
>
> What would be the best way of distributing my jpython assembler factories?
> I can use Class.forname (kinda like the O'reilly uploader did) so that you
> don't need jpython to compile. I can probably also make a separate .jar,
> but somehow that doesn't appeal to me... Any thoughts on this?
I suggest writing an Ant task for your new target that opens up a URL
connection and downloads the JAR file into the lib directory (if it
isn't already there).
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
