on 9/28/2000 7:32 AM, "Leon Messerschmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of jpython integration. I'm not sure if we want to distribute the
> jpython.jar with Turbine - most people will probably not want to.
I'm not even sure if we _can_. What is the license on it?
> What would be the best way of distributing my jpython assembler factories?
> I can use Class.forname (kinda like the O'reilly uploader did) so that you
> don't need jpython to compile. I can probably also make a separate .jar,
> but somehow that doesn't appeal to me... Any thoughts on this?
Make it a compile time target. Take a look at how John just did the JSP
stuff.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
