Craig Berry wrote:
>
> Other than the JSP part, this isn't a real dichotomy. You can use J2EE and
> EJBs behind a site hosted on Turbine, with your modules calling into this
> layer for enterprise data and business logic. Turbine is just about
> presentation and interaction management (mostly), the View and some of the
> Controller layer in an MVC architecture.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Ludewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:19 AM
> To: 'Turbine'
> Subject: Would Like to Use Turbine
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm in charge of selecting the technology for a new web system at AudioBase.
> I'm
> inclined to use Turbine, and was wondering if someone could answer a
> question
> for me. The marketing and management folks have heard a lot of the hype
> surrounding J2EE, JSP & EJBs. Can someone make a compelling argument that
> would
> go over well with business types on why we should ignore the 'enterprise
> standard' promoted by Sun and use Turbine. Jason Hunter has provided a good
> argument for using WebMacro or Velocity, so I guess I'm really looking for
> why
> Turbine is better than EJB solutions provided by others. You don't need to
> convince me as a programmer. I'm looking for reasoning that would appeal to
> the
> biz types.
Hi Carl, long time no tty! :)
Let's not forget things like the connection pool and Torque.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
