Sorry for the confusion. This is inside the turbine source (e.g. torque to
name one). Not my own stuff.
I guess it's a matter of philosophy. I can see you point.
I would think that a value not defined in a properties file shouldn't
cause a run time exception unless the property is critical.
If this is the mode that the code is developed under, that's fine. I
just wanted to bring it to someone's attention.
thanks
mike
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:13:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> Mike Haberman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Mike, most references to properties file values are or should be wrapped
> > > in a method that allows a default to be supplied.
> > > --
> > >
> >
> > I agree, but in several cases, they are not. So you end up with a lot
> > of NPE at run time.
>
> Only with a misconfigured properties file. Are you wrapping them in the
> calls which supply defaults?
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
