Mike Haberman wrote:
>
> Sorry for the confusion. This is inside the turbine source (e.g. torque to
> name one). Not my own stuff.
No confusion here.
> I guess it's a matter of philosophy. I can see you point.
> I would think that a value not defined in a properties file shouldn't
> cause a run time exception unless the property is critical.
Agreed. I would prefer that Turbine wouldn't even start up if
misconfigured, but I'm guessing that not all critical properties
everywhere are checked at startup time. The next best thing is a
runtime exception.
> If this is the mode that the code is developed under, that's fine. I
> just wanted to bring it to someone's attention.
Your patches are welcomed. :)
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
