Sounds great. I'm familar with this kind of CVS reorg. Checking things
out again is often necessary.
On Tuesday, November 7, 2000, at 10:30 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Jason van Zyl[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:30:05 AM
> > To: Turbine
> > Subject: Re: turbine.torque?
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Carl Ludewig wrote:
>
> > What's the ETA on the new org.apache.turbine.torque package? I have some bug fixes
>I'd
> like to make in torque, but am holding off until the latest stuff becomes available
>in CVS.
>
> I'm ready now to push all the new version of torque, I'm just
> trying to coordinate with the list now.
>
> This is actually going to require jon erasing a couple of
> directories on the CVS server, then we're going to have to
> re-check out Turbine, then I will add the new torque stuff.
>
> I know this is a PITA, but I've totally re-organized everything
> and there would be a ton of dead directories lying around otherwise.
>
> If anyone strongly object to the re-checking out then I can
> probably work around it.
>
> jvz.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
