On 2000.12.04 16:34:57 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry about Torque, what you actually fixed I have working here. I
> should have left it working in CVS and pushed in a complete fix.
> I unexpectedly became preoccupied with something else :-) Thanks
> for fixing it.
No problem, it was an opportunity to have fun (!) finding my way around the
implementation. Which reminds me - I have a patch to add an "implements"
attribute to the table tag, which as you might expect specifies an
interface that the BaseObject subclass will implement. Any objections?
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homo sum: humani nihil a me alienum puto
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
